Comparison of Peritoneal Catheter Insertion Techniques: A Single-Center Experience Comparing Percutaneous and Laparoscopic Approaches
Catheter Insertion and Peritoneal Dialysis
Abstract views: 139
/ 
PDF downloads: 73
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10019799Keywords:
peritoneal dialysis, percutaneous Seldinger technique, laparoscopic peritoneal catheter insertion, complicationsAbstract
Background: There is still no consensus on the best approach for the insertion of the peritoneal dialysis catheter. We aimed to compare the results of the percutaneous Sildenger and laparoscopic surgical peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion approaches
Methods: The study examined the files of patients in the chronic PD program retrospectively. Demographic characteristics such as early and late complications, attacks of infection, time of use of the catheter, and number of hospitalizations were recorded to compare both methods. (Tablo 1). The results were evaluated through appropriate statistical analysis of the data.
Results: In our study, 32 (53.3%) out of 60 patients included were males. Patients were divided into two groups, the percutaneous PD catheter group (Group 1, n=36) and the Laparoscopic PD catheter group (Group 2, n = 24). The average age for group 1 was 65 years, while it was 57 years for group 2 (p = 0.197). The median follow-up time of the study population was 17 months (7-41). The average first usage time of the PD catheter was 13.5 (11-16.5) days in group 1 versus 21.5 (18.5-27.5) days (p 0.001) in group 2. The exit site leak was 11.1% (n = 4) versus 33.3% (n = 8) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.039). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of hospitalization, renal replacement treatment transition, and death.
Conclusion: The percutaneous approach for PD catheter insertion is more advantageous compared to surgical techniques with fewer complications. More importantly, there is no risk of anesthesia, in addition to shorter incisions and less hospitalization time.
References
Khan SF, Rosner MH. Optimizing peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. Frontiers in Nephrology. 2023;3. doi:10.3389/fneph.2023.1056574
Ogunc G. Minilaparoscopic extraperitoneal tunneling with omentopexy: a new technique for CAPD catheter placement. Perit Dial Int. 2005;25(6):551-555. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16411520
Zaman F, Pervez A, Atray NK, Murphy S, Work J, Abreo KD. Fluoroscopy-assisted placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters by nephrologists. Semin Dial. 2005;18(3):247-251. doi:10.1111/j.1525-139X.2005.18321.x
Comert M, Borazan A, Kulah E, Uçan BH. A new laparoscopic technique for the placement of a permanent peritoneal dialysis catheter: the preperitoneal tunneling method. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(2):245-248. doi:10.1007/s00464-003-9302-7
Jo YI, Shin SK, Lee JH, Song JO, Park JH. Immediate initiation of CAPD following percutaneous catheter placement without break-in procedure. Perit Dial Int. 2007;27(2):179-183. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17299155
İnanç GN, Terzioğlu ME, Karabulut Y, Yılmaz Z, Tarhan EF, Enecik ME, et al. A national, multicenter, retrospective study evaluating retention rate and efficacy of tocilizumab treatment in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to csDMARDs and/or TNF inhibitors. Turk J Med Sci. 2023;53(3):731-743. doi:10.55730/1300-0144.5636
Kache SA, Sale D, Makama JG. Techniques for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. In: Evolving Strategies in Peritoneal Dialysis. InTech; 2018. doi:10.5772/intechopen.75355
Tanratananon D, Deekae S, Raksasuk S, Srithongkul T. Evaluation of different methods to improve culture-negative peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis: A single-center study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;63:102139. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.087
He P, He LJ, Huang C, Hu JP, Sun SR. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Treatment Failure in Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis. Front Med. 2021;8:699502. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.699502
Crabtree JH, Chow KM. Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion. Semin Nephrol. 2017;37(1):17-29. doi:10.1016/j.semnephrol.2016.10.004
Li Z, Fang Z, Ding H, Sun J, Li Y, Liu J, et al. Success rates and safety of a modified percutaneous PD catheter placement technique: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters using a multifunctional bladder paracentesis trocar. Medicine . 2022;101(31):e29694. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000029694
Zhao S, Zhu X, Li Q, Zhu B, Wang Y, Cui W, et al. A simplified percutaneous technique for inserting Tenckhoff catheters for peritoneal dialysis. Clin Nephrol. 2019;91(1):17-24. doi:10.5414/CN109410
Yau KK, Siu WT, Law BKB, Cheung HYS, Ha JPY, Li MKW. Laparoscopic approach compared with conventional open approach for bezoar-induced small-bowel obstruction. Arch Surg. 2005;140(10):972-975. doi:10.1001/archsurg.140.10.972
Lee WG, Tran PU, Grills R. Long-term outcomes of peritoneal dialysis catheters inserted by laparoscopic and percutaneous techniques in a single regional dialysis centre. ANZ J Surg. 2022;92(7-8):1873-1878. doi:10.1111/ans.17644
Al-Hwiesh AK. Percutaneous versus laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: simplicity and favorable outcome. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2014;25(6):1194-1201. doi:10.4103/1319-2442.144252
Crabtree JH, Shrestha BM, Chow KM, Figueiredo AE, Povlsen JV, Wilkie M, et al. Creating and Maintaining Optimal Peritoneal Dialysis Access in the Adult Patient: 2019 Update. Perit Dial Int. 2019;39(5):414-436. doi:10.3747/pdi.2018.00232
Gajjar AH, Rhoden DH, Kathuria P, Kaul R, Deviprakash Udupa A, Jennings WC. Peritoneal dialysis catheters: laparoscopic versus traditional placement techniques and outcomes. Am J Surg. 2007;194(6):872-876. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.038
Draganic B, James A, Booth M, Gani JS. Comparative experience of a simple technique for laparoscopic chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. Aust N Z J Surg. 1998;68(10):735-739. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04662.x
Qiao Q, Zhou L, Hu K, Xu D, Li L, Lu G. Laparoscopic versus traditional peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: a meta analysis. Ren Fail. Published online March 4, 2016. doi:10.3109/0886022X.2015.1077313
Szeto CC, Li PKT, Johnson DW, Bernardini J, Dong J, Figueiredo AE, et al. ISPD Catheter-Related Infection Recommendations: 2017 Update. Perit Dial Int. 2017;37(2):141-154. doi:10.3747/pdi.2016.00120
Agarwal A, Whitlock RH, Bamforth RJ, Ferguson TW, Sabourin JM, Hu Q, et al. Percutaneous Versus Surgical Insertion of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2021;8:20543581211052731. doi:10.1177/20543581211052731
Abdijalil G, Shuijuan S. Laparoscopic versus Open-surgery Catheter Placement in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Meta-analysis of Outcomes. Indian J Nephrol. 2022;32(1):8-15. doi:10.4103/ijn.IJN_482_20
Surgical versus percutaneous techniques for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement: A meta-analysis of the outcomes. Ann West Med Surg. 2016;10:11-18. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2016.07.007
Oliver MJ, Perl J, McQuillan R, Blake PG, Jain AK, McCormick B, et al. Quantifying the risk of insertion-related peritoneal dialysis catheter complications following laparoscopic placement: Results from the North American PD Catheter Registry. Perit Dial Int. 2020;40(2):185-192. doi:10.1177/0896860819893813
Shahbandari M, Amiran A. Comparison of the complications of open surgery versus laparoscopic technique in insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter. J Res Med Sci. 2019;24:85. doi:10.4103/jrms.JRMS_1097_18
Povlsen JV, Sørensen AB, Ivarsen P. Unplanned Start on Peritoneal Dialysis Right after PD Catheter Implantation for Older People with End-Stage Renal Disease. Perit Dial Int. 2015;35(6):622-624. doi:10.3747/pdi.2014.00347
Liu WJ, Hooi LS. Complications after tenckhoff catheter insertion: a single-centre experience using multiple operators over four years. Perit Dial Int. 2010;30(5):509-512. doi:10.3747/pdi.2009.00083
Boujelbane L, Fu N, Chapla K, Melnick D, Redfield RR, Waheed S, et al. Percutaneous versus surgical insertion of PD catheters in dialysis patients: a meta-analysis. J Vasc Access. 2015;16(6):498-505. doi:10.5301/jva.5000439
Jwo SC, Chen KS, Lee CC, Chen HY. Prospective randomized study for comparison of open surgery with laparoscopic-assisted placement of Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter--a single center experience and literature review. J Surg Res. 2010;159(1):489-496. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2008.09.008
Ma Y, Liu S, Yang M, Zou Y, Xue D, Liu Y, et al. Association between different peritoneal dialysis catheter placement methods and shortterm postoperative complications. BMC Nephrol. 2021;22(1):151. doi:10.1186/s12882-021-02340-y
Moreiras Plaza M, Cuíña L, Goyanes GR, Sobrado JA, Gonzalez L. Mechanical complications in chronic peritoneal dialysis. Clin Nephrol. 1999;52(2):124-130. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10480224
Basile B, De Padova F, Parisi A, Montanaro A, Giordano R. Routine insertion of permanent peritoneal dialysis catheters in the nephrology ward. The sliding percutaneous technique. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2004;56(4):359-365. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15785429
Zappacosta AR, Perras ST, Closkey GM. Seldinger technique for Tenckhoff catheter placement. ASAIO Trans. 1991;37(1):13-15. doi:10.1097/00002480-199101000-00005
Koc Y, Unsal A, Yetkin G, Yilmaz M, Basturk T, Uludag M, et al. Comparison of the early complications of two different catheter implantation techniques. Turk Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;19(1):23-28. doi:10.5262/tndt.2010.1001.03
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mahmud İslam, Necattin Fırat, Ahmed Cihad Genç, Zafer Ercan, Sibel Gökçay Bek, Sibel Balcı, Hamad Dheir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a 